Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Citroen C4 Cactus 2014
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 33 HP more power than Citroen C4 Cactus, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Citroen C4 Cactus. Thanks to more power Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Cactus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pulsar could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pulsar consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Cactus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is larger. Nissan Pulsar is 23 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Cactus, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 358 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1170 litres | |
|
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pulsar has 27 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Cactus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Cactus, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Pulsar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Citroen C4 Cactus has
| |