Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Renault Megane 2016
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Nissan Pulsar engine produces 50 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Renault Megane. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
690 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Pulsar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Pulsar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
Nissan Pulsar is 3 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 384 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 1247 litres | |
Nissan Pulsar has 1 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pulsar (by 148 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7200 | 11 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Renault Megane has
| |