Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Renault Megane 2016

 
Nissan Pulsar
2014 - 2018
Renault Megane
2016 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP165 HP
Torque: 190 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 secondsn/a seconds
Nissan Pulsar engine produces 50 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Renault Megane.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.0no data
Fuel tank capacity: 46 litres50 litres
690 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 156 mm (6.1 inches)145 mm (5.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Pulsar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Pulsar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.36 m
Width: 1.77 m1.81 m
Height: 1.52 m1.45 m
Nissan Pulsar is 3 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres384 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1395 litres1247 litres
Nissan Pulsar has 1 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pulsar (by 148 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.2 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`750no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 720011 200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Pulsar has
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Renault Megane has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv