Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 5 HP more power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Fiat Tipo. Thanks to more power Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that by driving the Nissan Pulsar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pulsar consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Pulsar is 2 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Pulsar has 55 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. This could mean that the Nissan Pulsar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.7 metres less than that of the Fiat Tipo, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |