Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Honda Jazz 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Nissan Pulsar
2014 - 2018
Honda Jazz
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)1.2 - 1.3 (petrol)


Power: 110 - 190 HP90 - 102 HP
Torque: 165 - 260 NM114 - 127 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 - 12.7 seconds11.4 - 12.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.6 - 5.14.5 - 5.5
Nissan Pulsar petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 4.39 m3.90 m
Width: 1.77 m1.70 m
Height: 1.52 m1.53 m
Nissan Pulsar is larger, but slightly lower.
Nissan Pulsar is 49 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 385 litres337 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1395 litres883 litres
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage capacity.
Nissan Pulsar has 48 litres more trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pulsar (by 512 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`768~ 1`581
Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests.

above average
Average price (€): 76006000
Pros and Cons: Nissan Pulsar has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Honda Jazz has
  • only petrol engines available
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: