Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Honda Jazz 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 190 HP | 90 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 260 NM | 114 - 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 12.7 seconds | 11.4 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.1 | 4.5 - 5.5 | |
|
Nissan Pulsar petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Pulsar is 49 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 883 litres | |
|
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pulsar has 48 litres more trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pulsar (by 512 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`768 | ~ 1`581 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |