Nissan Primastar 2006 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Primastar engine produces 10 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.8 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Primastar consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Primastar could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Primastar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.75 m | |
| Nissan Primastar is 8 cm longer than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Primastar is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Primastar has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |