Nissan Primastar 2006 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Primastar engine produces 80 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 5.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Primastar consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Primastar could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Trafic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.74 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 906 litres | 885 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2430 litres | |
|
Nissan Primastar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volkswagen Sharan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`370 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Primastar has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |