Nissan Primastar 2011 vs Ford Galaxy 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Primastar engine produces 95 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Nissan Primastar reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.5 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Primastar consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Primastar could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Nissan Primastar is smaller, but higher. Nissan Primastar is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Primastar is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 2150 litres | 300 litres | |
|
Nissan Primastar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Primastar has 1850 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`790 | 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Primastar has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |