Nissan Primastar 2011 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Primastar engine produces 25 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Nissan Primastar reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.7 | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Primastar consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Primastar could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
1360 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.94 m | 1.72 m | |
Nissan Primastar is 7 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Primastar is 22 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 2150 litres | 267 litres | |
Nissan Primastar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Primastar has 1883 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. The Seat Alhambra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Primastar is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`790 | 2`370 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Primastar has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |