Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Mazda CX-9 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 251 HP | 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Patrol engine produces 12 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 81 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 76 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Patrol engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 1 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is larger. Nissan Patrol and Mazda CX-9 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 810 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 810 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2852 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`080 | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |