Nissan Patrol 1997 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Nissan Patrol engine produces 21 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.9 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Patrol consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Patrol is 53 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 810 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 810 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 1.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Nissan Patrol can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |