Nissan Patrol 2003 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.8 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 HP | 238 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 434 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Nissan Patrol is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Patrol engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 34 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 18.2 | 16.4 | |
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Patrol consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 96 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.01 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
Nissan Patrol is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 3 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 183 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 183 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2287 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`100 | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9600 | 9400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 9.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |