Nissan Patrol 1998 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 4.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 74 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 178 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Patrol is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Nissan Patrol over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Patrol engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is smaller. Nissan Patrol is 49 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Nissan Patrol can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |