Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Land Rover Freelander 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 30 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 540 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is larger. Nissan Patrol is 8 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Patrol has 150 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Nissan Patrol uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 1.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Nissan Patrol can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |