Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 3 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Nissan Patrol is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Nissan Patrol has 499 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 1.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Nissan Patrol can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |