Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Patrol engine produces 60 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 75 litres | |
| 820 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is larger. Nissan Patrol is 8 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 29 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |