Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Citroen C-Crosser 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Patrol engine produces 4 HP more power than Citroen C-Crosser, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C-Crosser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 540 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Crosser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C-Crosser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4007 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C-Crosser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.67 m | |
| Nissan Patrol is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Crosser, 13 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 184 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 605 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan Patrol has more luggage space (by 164 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 1.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C-Crosser, which means Nissan Patrol can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Citroen C-Crosser has
| |