Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.8 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 7 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.6 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Nissan Patrol is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |