Nissan Patrol 2000 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 323 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.9 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 8 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 37 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.7 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Patrol is 57 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 11 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 607 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 607 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1998 litres | 1950 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Patrol (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 1.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Nissan Patrol can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`080 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |