Nissan Patrol 2000 vs Ford F150 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 5.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Patrol) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford F150) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 323 NM | 495 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Patrol engine produces 142 HP less power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 172 NM less than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 14.7 | |
|
The Nissan Patrol is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Patrol consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that by driving the Nissan Patrol over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 114 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is smaller. Nissan Patrol is 67 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 607 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 607 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1998 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 13.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 1.5 metres less than that of the Ford F150, which means Nissan Patrol can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`080 kg | 3`198 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`410 kg | 2`395 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 670 kg | 803 kg | |
| Nissan Patrol load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Ford F150. Therefore, Ford F150 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Ford F150 has
| |