Nissan Patrol 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 33 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 148 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Nissan Patrol is 35 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Patrol is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Patrol has 499 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Patrol uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |