Nissan Patrol 1998 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Patrol is 52 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Patrol has 215 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Patrol uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 1.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Nissan Patrol can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |