Nissan Patrol 1998 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 6 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 8 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Nissan Patrol is 25 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 605 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |