Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 168 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 402 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Nissan Patrol engine produces 8 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 75 litres | |
820 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Patrol engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 26 years | 30 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.15 m | no data | |
Width: | 1.94 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.86 m | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 810 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2226 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`110 | 2`910 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 400 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |