Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Mazda CX-9 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Patrol) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda CX-9) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 263 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Patrol engine produces 103 HP less power than Mazda CX-9, but torque is 41 NM more than Mazda CX-9. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 11.5 | |
|
The Nissan Patrol is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Patrol consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that by driving the Nissan Patrol over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Patrol gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-9 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Patrol is larger. Nissan Patrol is 8 cm longer than the Mazda CX-9, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Patrol is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 810 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 487 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 810 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2226 litres | 2852 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 626 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`110 | 2`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |