Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 390 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 17 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 11.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Patrol is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Nissan Patrol over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Nissan Patrol is 20 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Patrol is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 810 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2226 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 0.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Nissan Patrol can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`110 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |