Nissan Patrol 2004 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Patrol engine produces 153 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 320 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Nissan Patrol reaches 100 km/h speed 8.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Patrol consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Patrol could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Patrol consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Terrano | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 810 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2226 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`110 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Patrol has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |