Nissan Patrol 1998 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Patrol
1998 - 2003
Toyota Land Cruiser
1990 - 1998
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.8 - 4.52.8 - 4.5

Performance

Power: 130 - 200 HP91 - 215 HP
Torque: 252 - 363 NM188 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15 - 17.5 seconds11.4 - 16 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.2 - 15.011.2 - 17.8
Nissan Patrol petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Nissan Patrol equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.84 m
Width: 1.89 m1.89 m
Height: 1.84 m1.91 m
Nissan Patrol is smaller.
Nissan Patrol is 42 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Patrol is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 605 litres832 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1374 litres1370 litres
Nissan Patrol has 227 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Patrol (by 4 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Patrol is 1.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Nissan Patrol can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`734~ 2`993
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 960011 800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Patrol has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv