Nissan Pathfinder 2005 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 269 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 9 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mazda CX-7. Despite the higher power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.4 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.64 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 6 cm longer than the Mazda CX-7, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 515 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | 774 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 1317 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`793 | 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |