Nissan Pathfinder 2005 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Pathfinder) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda CX-7) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 86 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, but torque is 23 NM more than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.64 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 6 cm longer than the Mazda CX-7, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 515 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | 774 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 1317 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`880 | 2`301 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |