Nissan Pathfinder 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 16 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Pathfinder engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is smaller. Nissan Pathfinder is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 515 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.8 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`793 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |