Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Pathfinder) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Land Rover Freelander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 317 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 2 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 233 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 13.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Navara | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Pathfinder 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Pathfinder 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 31 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 565 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Nissan Pathfinder can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`980 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |