Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 241 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 51 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is smaller. Nissan Pathfinder and Jeep Grand Cherokee are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Nissan Pathfinder has 590 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 537 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`880 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |