Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 40 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Pathfinder engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 24 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2091 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 399 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 422 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pathfinder is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`880 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |