Nissan Pathfinder 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 55 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 28 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 16 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2091 litres | 2013 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 78 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`880 kg | 3`175 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |