Nissan Pathfinder 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 44 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.7 | |
| Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2013: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC60 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 36 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 453 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2260 litres | 1455 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 805 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |