Nissan Pathfinder 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 375 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 115 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 185 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 453 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2260 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |