Nissan Pathfinder 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 79 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 375 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.7 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder and Land Rover Range Rover are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 453 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2260 litres | 2030 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.3 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 47 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |