Nissan Pathfinder 2012 vs Ford Explorer 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 260 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 325 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 11 HP more power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 20 NM less than Ford Explorer. Thanks to more power Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 11.0 | |
| Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder and Ford Explorer are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 595 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 453 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 595 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2260 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |