Nissan Pathfinder 2012 vs BMW X6 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 260 HP | 249 HP | |
Torque: | 325 NM | 560 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 11 HP more power than BMW X6, but torque is 235 NM less than BMW X6. Despite the higher power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 6.0 | |
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 600 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 85 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1410 km in combined cycle | |
820 km on highway | 1540 km on highway | ||
BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.01 m | 4.91 m | |
Width: | 1.96 m | 1.99 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
Nissan Pathfinder is 10 cm longer than the BMW X6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 8 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 580 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 453 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 580 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2260 litres | 1525 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 735 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`780 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 12 800 | 33 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
BMW X6 has
| |