Nissan Pathfinder 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 368 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 81 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Murano | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 37 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 17 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 603 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |