Nissan Pathfinder 1990 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 153 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 244 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 5 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 31 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 66 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 9 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 15 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 890 litres | 258 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1080 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pathfinder has 632 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |