Nissan Pathfinder 1997 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 279 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 94 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is smaller. Nissan Pathfinder is 27 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |