Nissan Pathfinder 1997 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | no data | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 279 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 32 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 121 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 9.7 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is smaller. Nissan Pathfinder is 8 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Nissan Pathfinder has 669 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 377 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |