Nissan Pathfinder 1997 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is smaller. Nissan Pathfinder is 27 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |