Nissan Pathfinder 1997 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 13 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Mercedes ML. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is smaller. Nissan Pathfinder is 11 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |