Nissan Pathfinder 1997 vs Land Rover Defender 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 28 HP more power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Land Rover Defender. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 10.8 | |
|
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 2.08 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Defender, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 33 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |