Nissan Pathfinder 1997 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 334 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 58 HP less power than Isuzu Rodeo, but torque is 44 NM more than Isuzu Rodeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 12.3 | |
| Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Rodeo, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is larger. Nissan Pathfinder is 2 cm longer than the Isuzu Rodeo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 933 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | 2297 litres | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 498 litres less trunk space than the Isuzu Rodeo. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Isuzu Rodeo (by 627 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |