Nissan Pathfinder 1995 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 271 NM | 318 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 32 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 13.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 29 years | 29 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is smaller. Nissan Pathfinder is 27 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |