Nissan Pathfinder 1995 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 271 NM | 384 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 30 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 113 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 11.8 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Pathfinder consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pathfinder could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Pathfinder is 8 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pathfinder is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Nissan Pathfinder has 669 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 377 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |