Nissan Pathfinder 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 243 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 359 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pathfinder engine produces 8 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 41 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Nissan Pathfinder reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.1 | 16.2 | |
| Nissan Pathfinder consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan Pathfinder over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 540 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | Used also on Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Nissan Pathfinder is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1076 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2407 litres | 2047 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Pathfinder has 28 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Nissan Pathfinder uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 360 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pathfinder has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |